RELATED: $11M apartment complex rejected by Springfield planning board
The City Planning Board recently recommended denying the proposal but city commissioners still could have approved it. A public hearing was set to be held at their last meeting on Jan. 30 but the developer pulled the application before the meeting. If approved, the developer planned to seek tax credits from the Ohio Housing Finance Agency to help pay for construction.
The developer chose not move forward with the rezoning due to feedback from the community, said project applicant Chad Nykiel, development director for TWG Development in an e-mail to the Springfield News-Sun.
“Since we were seeking tax credits to fund the project, we did not feel there was enough time to address the communities concerns and still meet the deadlines for this year’s funding round,” he said. “We are hopeful to revisit this project along with other available sites later this year and re-evaluate our options at that time.”
The apartment complex would have included 60 units with open floor plans, walk-in closets, in-unit washers and dryers, a fitness room and a community room, according to the application. The plan called for 15 one-bedroom apartments with about 750 square feet as well as 39 two-bedroom units with an average of 950 square feet and six three-bedroom units with about 1,300 square feet.
The decision to pull the proposal was based on public feedback, Springfield Planning, Zoning and Code Administrator Stephen Thompson said. The developer and city staff members will work to find a different location in the future, he said.
“They were on a pretty quick timeline and only had a few sites in mind when they came to us,” Thompson said.
FIRST REPORT: $11M apartment complex proposed at former Springfield school site
East side Springfield resident Mary Smith was relieved when she received a letter in the mail saying the application had been withdrawn.
“I’m just tired of all of this stuff coming in,” she said. “I don’t know what it’s going to do to our taxes or traffic, keeping up the roads. Times are just rough.”
Springfield city staff members recommended approval of the rezoning, according to public documents. The complex was originally proposed at a different site but staff members believed the old Schaefer site might have been more appropriate, Thompson said.
At the Dec. 11 hearing, the planning board recommended denying the application because more than a dozen residents spoke out against the plan, Thompson said.
MORE SPRINGFIELD NEWS: Need for United Way greater than ever in U.S. cities, Springfield
Several residents were upset with the proposal, believing low-income housing would affect the neighborhood, including traffic, Thompson said.
The application says the proposal wouldn’t have been for Section 8 housing vouchers, according to public documents.
Economic growth and new jobs have created a demand for housing in Springfield, the application says. The Ohio Housing Needs Assessment also shows the Clark County market is under-served for families, developers said.
5 QUICK NEWS-SUN READS
Sexual orientation added to Springfield non-discrimination ordinance
Springfield commission at odds over landlord/tenant rights debate
Springfield-based food bank to re-examine distribution model
Clark County commissioners reject tax for new 9-1-1 center — for now
Clark County to recruit relatives, foster families due to drug crisis
Unmatched coverage
The Springfield News-Sun digs into important stories that affect your neighborhoods, including recent stories on residents fighting to block a Dollar General store in Bethel Twp. and the development of a parts supplier at the former Navistar plant on Lagonda Ave.
BY THE NUMBERS
$11 million: Amount being spent on the proposed apartment complex
60: Units in the proposed three-story apartment building
12: Years the Schaefer Junior High property has sat vacant
About the Author